Total views : 889

An Effective Tool for the Attainment of Course Outcome's and Programme Outcome's

R. Vijaya Prakash *

Affiliations

  • Department Of Computer Science and Engineering, Sr Engineering College, Warangal, India

DOI:

Abstract


The Outcome Based Education (OBE) has been one of the major concern of most academic institutions in India, especially among engineering colleges since the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) has made it compulsory towards program accreditation. However, the concept of OBE resulted to various attainment to Programme Outcome (PO) based on the Course Outcome (CO). Execution of the OBE may not be an easy matter as the mapping of the CO for each assessment may be mapped to multiple PO. This paper describe the analysis process of the CO and PO attainment for Design and Analysis of Algorithms subject, which is offered to 2nd year students of Computer Science and Engineering, SR Engineering College, Warangal. Two methods are incorporated, (1) direct measurement, and (2) segregated measurement. The study identified that segregated measurement are more sensitive towards identifying the issues which affect attainment of CO and PO. Issues related to non-fulfillment of either CO or PO for Design and Analysis of Algorithms subject can be traced to lack of awareness towards Problem Analysis and Complexity of Algorithms and student's attitude towards subject knowledge.

Keywords

Outcome Based Education, Course Outcome, Programme Outcome, Engineering Education.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 81)

References


  • Ashley Kranov, Michael Milligan, Joe Sussman, 'Dispelling Myths: Common Misconception about ABET and Accreditation', ABET Annual Conference, October 2011

  • NBA website PPT on Outcome Based Education and Accreditation - Awareness Workshop for Evaluators and stakeholders; http://www.nbaind.org/En/1027-formsandformats.aspx

  • Gloria Rogers, ABET Fall 2010 Webinar on “Defining Student Outcomes”, www.abet.org

  • Amy Driscoll and Swarup Wood, “Developing Outcomes-based Assessment for Leamercentric Education”, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, Virginia (2007)

  • S. M. Ali Askar, “Implementation of OBE in Engineering Education: Are we there yet?,” in International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 2009, pp. 164—166.

  • Z. Abidin, N. Omar, H. Hashim, M. Fuad, A. Latip, and M. M. Othman, “Outcome Based Education Performance Evaluation on Electrical Engineering Laboratory Module,” in International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 2009, pp. 153-158.

  • A. A. Mutalib, R. A. A. Rahmat, A. K. A. Rashid, F. Suja, and S. Sahril, “Measurement and Evaluation of Program Outcomes in the Civil Engineering Courses,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.,v ol. 60, no. 0,pp. 333-342, Oct. 2012.

  • M. Jaafar, N. Nordin, R. Wagiran, M. J. M. M. N. A. Aziz, M. R. Osman, J. Noozaei, and F. N. A. Abdulaziz, “Assessment Strategy for an Outcome Based Education,” in International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 2010.

  • I. Z. Abidin, A. Anuar, and N. H. Shuaib, “Assessing the attainment of course outcome (CO) for an engineering course,” in 2nd International Conference o f Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009), 2009, pp. 1-7.

  • U. Anisa, U. Amirulddin, M. Osman, and F. A. Hamid, “Analysis o f Programme Outcomes A chievem ent for Electrical Engineering Programmes in UNITEN,” in International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 2009,pp. 148-152.

  • Richard M. Felder, “Hard Assessment O f Soft Skills”, Chemical Journal o f Engineering Education, 44(1), 63-64 (2010).

  • Richard M. Felder, “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria” Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25 (2003).



DOI: