Practical Approach to Handle Large Classes:A Case Study for Keeping Sessions Live
DOI:
Abstract
Today's graduate is characterize to be self directed, process-oriented, product-oriented, casuistic and possess lifelong learning skills. They also need to be critical thinker, creative, problem solvers, innovator and analytical in their approach. In present teaching scenario of Engineering, some faculties are still practicing the traditional approach of delivery the lecture in large classroom such as chalkand- talk or pen-and-paper teaching. Teaching the course of Theory of Computations (TOC) at B Tech and Software architecture at M Tech level is challenging because of their more mathematical and theoretical nature respectively. In addition, the conventional approach to course teaching for noninteractive mathematical solutions&heavy architectural of software design, make the classrooms more steady.
We identified problem of in-activeness of students in large classroom learning theoretical subjects. Solution for the problem is identified using best practice method [1]. Root causes were identified in analysis phase of best practice method for large classroom dynamics and to make joyful learning. This was taken as basis for development of a solution and we identified the best solution as think and ink, Activity based learning [2], Group Discussion [5], JFLAP simulation tool [4], Crossword[11], Alice tool[10], proprietary software package presentations as group assignment to deal realistic scenario.
Keywords
Full Text:
| (PDF views: 77)References
- Mr.Shivananda R. Poojara, Mr.Khyamling A. Parane Department of CSE, RIT, Rajaramnagar “Technology Enhanced teaching Learning using palm devices” presented at IUCEE conference on ICTIEE 2013 BVB Hubli, published in springer 2014.
- Vijayalaskhmi M, Karibasappa K.G Dept, of CSE, BVB Hubli, “Activity Based Teaching Learning in Formal Languages and Automata Theory - An Experience” Journal of Engineering Education, 92 (2),7-25 (2003).
- G. Subramonian and P. Prabha SRKV College of Education, Coimbatore, “A study on learning ability in elementary school mathematics based on ABL (Activity Based Learning) approach” International Journal for Life Sciences and Educational Research Vol.2 (1), pp. 8 -11, January-2014.
- Susan H. Rodger Dept, of CSE at Duke University,” Increasing Engagement in Automata Theory with JFLAP” Visual Thinking Workshop-Duke University May 4, 2009 Supported by NSF Grant DUE 0442513.
- Teo Chiang Juay Department of Mechanical Engineering, “using video clips, small group discussions and student surveys to teach a general education module (gem)” PDP-T Projects Jan/Feb 2013.
- Richard M. Felder Department of Chemical Engineering North Carolina State University “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria” Journal of Engineering Education, 92 (1), 7-25 (2003).
- Bloom, Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956). Published by Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright (c) 1984 by Pearson Education.
- Hopcroft. J. E., Motwani. R, and Ullman. J. D. “Introduction to Automata Theory, Language, and Computation”. Addison-Wesley, 3rd edition, 2007
- Linz P, “An Introduction to Formal Languages and Automata”, Narosa Puplishing, 4thedition, 2006.
- An innovative and revolutionary approach of teaching programming concepts using Alice Infosys campus connects
- [ 11 ]http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossword.
DOI: