Total views : 394

A Systematic Approach to Teaching and Learning Machine Design Course

Vinod Kumar V. Meti 1*, A. C. Giriyapur 1, I. G. Siddhalingeshwar 2, Pooja Sadalagi 2

Affiliations

  • Automation & Robotics Department, B.V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engg & Tech., Hubli, Karnataka, India
  • Automobile Engineering, B.V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engg & Tech., Hubli, Karnataka, India

DOI:

Abstract


In this modern world students are looking at new method of learning the courses and as well it is very difficult for the instructors/teachers to take attention of students to teach the theory courses. This paper brings a different method of teaching and learning methodology for the machine design course. In this, the tutorial and course project has been linked to the course to develop student's involvement, complex thinking, team management skills, and higher order thinking skills. Here the author would like to share some of the new techniques extracted from the outcome based learning and project based learning approaches to make students and teachers to involve in to the course. Student's feedback and the project did show their involvement in the course.

Keywords

Techniques, Project, Tutorial, Learning, Involvement.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 107)

References


  • Oriah Akir, Tang Howe Eng, Senian Malie (2012), “Teaching and learning enhancement through outcomebased education structure and technology e-learning support”, 1877-0428 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62, 87-92.

  • Robert L. Hatcher et al., “Competency-Based Education for Professional Psychology: Moving From Concept to Practice”, Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2013, Vol. 7, No. 4, 225-234.

  • Arends (1997), “Classroom instruction and management”, New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Diehl, W., Grobe, T., Lopez, H., & Cabral, C. (1999), “Project-based learning: A strategy for teaching and learning”, Boston: Center for Youth Development and Education, Corporation for Business, Work, and Learning.

  • Thomas, J. W. (1998), “An Overview of Project-based Learning”, Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

  • Erica Baker et al., “Project-based Learning Model Relevant Learning for the 21st Century”, ©Pacific Education Institute, 2011.

  • Thomas, J.W. (1998), “Project-based learning: Overview”, Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000), “How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school”, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2001, November 1), “Project-based learning research”, Edutopia. www.edutopia.org.

  • Thomas, J.W. (2000), “A review of research on projectbased learning”, San Rafael, CA: Autodesk.http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research.

  • Boaler, J. (1999, March 31), “Mathematics for the moment, or the millennium? Education Week”.

  • SRI International. (2000, January), “Silicon valley challenge 2000: Year 4 Report”, San Jose, CA: Joint Venture, Silicon Valley Network.http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/sri/Reports.htm.

  • Railsback, J. (2002), “Project-based instruction: Creating excitement for learning”, Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.http://www.nwrel.org/request/2002aug/index.html.

  • Gladie Lui, Connie Shum, “Outcome-based education and student learning in managerial accounting in Hong Kong,” Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, Outcome-based education.

  • Faizah Abd Majid, “The Use of Reflective Journals in Outcome-Based Education During the Teaching Practicum,” Malaysian Journal Of ELT Research, Volume 4, ISSN: 1511-8002.

  • Margery H Davis, “Educational Strategies: Outcome Based Education,” JVME 30 (3) 2003 AAVMC.



DOI: