Total views : 635

Towards improving the Performance of the Weak Students through Identification and Effective Implementation of Tasks by the Quality Circle

U. M. Daivagna 1*, S. B. Yapalaparvi 2, D. N. Inaamadar 2, N. K. Honnagoudar 2

Affiliations

  • Hirasugar Institute of Technology, Nidasoshi, Tq Hukkeri, Dist. Belagavi, State Karnataka, 591236, India
  • Hirasugar Institute of Technology, Nidasoshi, India

DOI:

Abstract


In this paper the weak students are identified by Pareto analysis, the cause and effect diagrams are drawn for the critical subjects and weak students. The treatment of weak students is carried out by formation of quality circle. The faculties and instructors are the members and one of the senior faculties is the leader. In the Quality Circle meetings, they take strategies to improve the performance of weak students. The process involves guiding, monitoring assignment submissions, counseling, evaluation etc. The weak students are also taught by taking micro classes and motivated ethically through great people quotes. The examination tips along with the activities to be followed during academic study are stressed.

Keywords

Pareto Analysis, Weak Performed Students, Engineering, Analytical Subjects, Group Leader, and Recording of Submissions.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 424)

References


  • Hilary Coon ,Gregory Carey,David W. Fulker,J .C. Defries, University of Utah and University of Colorado, Boulder, “Influences of School Environment on the Academic Achievement Scores of Adopted and No adopted Children , INTELLIGENCE 17,1993, pp 79-104.

  • R.M. Felder, G.N Felder, E.J. Dietz, “The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes”, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 2002, pp.3–17.

  • Hermino Rodriguez Principe, “Factors influencing the students’ academic performance in the first accounting course; a comparative study between public and private Universities in Puerto Rico”, PhD Thesis, Nov 2005, pp 1-257

  • Cristina Pomales-García, Yili Liu, “Excellence in Engineering Education: Views of Undergraduate Engineering Students’, Journal of Engineering Education, July 2007, 252-262pp.

  • M.S. Farooq A.H. Chaudhary, M. Shafiq and G. Berhanu, “Factors Affecting Students’ Quality of Academic Performance: A Case of Secondary School Level” Journal of Quality and Technology Management, Vol.VII, Issue II, Dec 2011, pp 1-14.

  • Victor Lavy and Edith Sand,” The Friends Factor: How Students’ Social Networks affect Their Academic Achievement and Well-Being?” National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, October 2012.

  • Irfan Mushtaq and Shabana Nawaz Khan, “Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance”, Global Journal of Management and Business research, Vol.12, Issue 9, June 2012, Online ISSN: 2249-4588, pp 1-7.

  • Dr. V.P.Gosavi,” Threat of Vacant Seats in Engineering Colleges: Reasons and Remedies”, American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2(1), March-May, 2013, pp. 75-80.

  • Pimpa Cheewaprakobkit, “Study of Factors Analysis Affecting Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students in International Program”, Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2013 Vol. I, IMECS 2013, March 13 - 15, 2013, Hong Kong, ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online), pp1-5

  • Regina A. Garcia and Lilac A. Al-Safadi,” Intervention Strategies for the Improvement of Students’ Academic Performance in Data Structure Course”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 4, No. 5, October 2014,pp383-387.

  • Jai Ruby and Dr. K. David,” Analysis of Influencing Factors in Predicting Students Performance Using MLP-A Comparative Study”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization), Vol. 3, Issue 2, February 2015, ISSN (Online): 2320-9801, pp 10851092.

  • http://www.ghd.com/pdf/6. Pareto Analysis.pdf

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishikawa_diagram



DOI: