Total views : 438

Repository of Instructional and Assessment Techniques for OBE-Based Instructional Module Development System

Srividya K. Bansal 1*, Odesma Dalrymple 2

Affiliations

  • School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, TX, United States
  • Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States

DOI:

Abstract


Instructional Module Development System (IMODS) project IMODS) project aims to assist educators in developing a STEM-based curriculum, even if the educator has not had extensive or formal training in educational methods. Research shows that choice of appropriate curriculum and assessment methods are critical in successfully teaching students and having the students retain the information taught. The IMODS strives to be a tool to assist educators in building that curriculum which will include an instructional and assessment plan. To successfully achieve this goal, a variety of educational, instructional, and assessment strategies are required to be integrated into the program. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a repository of current best pedagogical and assessment practices that will be part of IMODS. We also present integration of this repository into the IMODS software to present options for assessment and instruction that align with the type/level of student learning desired based on selections the user makes when defining the learning objectives of the course.

Keywords

Instruction Design, Outcome-Based Education, Instructional & Assessment Techniques, Semantic Web-Based Software Tool.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 69)

References


  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwol, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. NewYorkLongman.
  • Andhare, K., Dalrymple, O., & Bansal, S. (2012). Learning Objectives Feature for Instructional Module Development System. Presented at the PSW American Society for Engineering Education Conference, SanLuisObispo,CA.
  • Antoniou, G., &Van; Harmelen, F. (2004). Asemantic web primer. MITPress.
  • Bansal, S., Bansal, A., & Dalrymple, O. (2015a). Outcome-based Education Model for Computer Science Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 28(2&3), 113-121.
  • Bansal, S., Dalrymple, O., & Gaffar, A. (2015b). Design, Development, and Implementation of the Instructional Module Development System (IMODs). In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (ASEE). Indianapolis, IN.
  • Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members. Allyn&Bacon;.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/~SB4310/HowPeopleLearn.pdf
  • Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Prince, M. J. (2011). Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineer ing Educ at ion, 100(1) , 89-122. http://doi.org/Article
  • Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Furman,G. C. (1994).Outcome-Based Education and Accountability. Education & Urban Soc., 26(4), 417437.
  • Harden, R. M., Crosby, J. R., & Davis, M. H. (1999). AMEE Guide No. 14. Outcome-Based Education: Part 1--An Introduction to Outcome-Based Education.MedicalTeacher, 21(1), 7-14.
  • Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing Instructional Objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction 3rd edition. The Center for Effective Performance, Inc.
  • National Research Council. (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10019
  • Science of education|Article about Science of education by The Free Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Scienceo feducation
  • Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Semantic web revisited. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 21(3), 96-101.
  • Spady, W. G. (1988). Organizing for Results: The Basis of Authentic Restructuring and Reform. EducationalLeadership, 46(2), 4-8.
  • Streveler, R. A., Smith, K. A., & Pilotte, M. (2012). Aligning Course Content, Assessment, and Delivery: Creating a Context for Outcome-Based Education. Outcome-Based Education and Engineering Curr iculum: Evaluat ion, Asses sment and Accreditation.Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGIGlobal.
  • Wiggins, G. P., &McTighe;, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.



DOI: