Total views : 832

Reward Feedback and Success for Inspiring Creative Minds: An Inspirational Model

Hari Mohan Pandey *

Affiliations

  • Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Amity University, Noida, U. P., India

DOI:

Abstract


In the present era of education, teaching and learning must transform to help learners foster aptitudes to prosper in the 21st century. the classroom activities assigned to learners at all levels are extremely important and it is mandatory for the learner to consistently follow and present the assigned work not only to earn superior grades in the exam but for the holistic development of skills associated with a subject. Previous research explains that revising the curriculum is an important factor of an effective teaching and learning. It helps in pinpointing those topics which students were not being able to comprehend because of numerous reasons. Effective teaching and learning can be achieved using various technologies and by

Keywords

Innovative Teaching Tractices, Student-Centered Teaching and Learning, Intrinsic Motivation, RFS (Reward, Feedback and Success) for Novice.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 244)

References


  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R, & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105.

  • Henderson, I G. (2001). Reflective teaching: Professional artistry through inquiry. Prentice Hall.

  • Pandey, H. M., & Turner, A. IPLP: A Method to Deliver Programming Techniques by Making Analogy.

  • Sandholtz, I H. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1234 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027.

  • Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: what is the research evidence? (p. 4). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of education goals by a committee of college and university examiners. David McKay.

  • Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom's taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R, & Holzinger, A. (2002). Student-centered teaching meets new media: Concept and case study. Educational Technology & Society, 5(4), 160-172.

  • Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case stady. Educational technology research and development, 48(3), 79-100.

  • Gardner, H. (1987). The theory of multiple intelligences. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1), 19-35.

  • Butler, Deborah L., and Philip H. Winne. 'Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis." Review of educational research 65.3 (1995): 245-281.

  • Higgins, Richard, Peter Hartley, and Alan Skelton. "The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning." Studies in Higher Education 27.1 (2002): 53-64.

  • Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. 'Developing the theory of formative assessment." Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education) 21.1 (2009): 5-31.

  • Pintrich, Paul R "A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts.". Journal of educational Psychology 95.4 (2003): 667.



DOI: