Total views : 70

'Team Learning' as an Innovative Pedagogical Tool: A Study among 'EE Generation' in Bangalore

S. John Manohar *

Affiliations

  • BMS College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Bangalore, India

DOI:

Abstract


The concept of team learning has gained greater importance in modern Engineering Education and there are many formal recommendations to adopt team culture so as to groom them to face the real life situations after they graduate from Engineering Educational institutions. A descriptive study regarding the usefulness of team learning among 137 Engineering Education (EE) students was undertaken. The focus of the study was on contextual variables. Chi-square tests were employed and it was found that there exists association between and among all the variables considered for this study. It is strongly recommended that the Engineering students be provided with these opportunities so as to enable them to have hands on experience on managing a team in real life situations.

Keywords

Engineering Education, Formal Recommendations, Descriptive Study, Contextual Variables, Longevity, Association of Attributes.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 29)

References


  • Bettenhausen, K.L (1991, June). Five years of group research. What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 345-381.

  • Burningham, C, and West, M.A. (1995) Individual, climate, and group interaction process as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group research, 26(1), 106-117

  • Comer, D.R (1995) A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations 49 (6) 647-667

  • Decker, R, (1995) Management team formation for large scale simulations. In J.D.Overby and A.L .Patz (Eds), Developments in business simulation and experimental exercises

  • Fowler, A (1995) How to build effective teams. People management, 1(4), 40-41.

  • Gentry, J.W (1980), Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience. Simulations and Games 11(4), 451-459.

  • Gosenpud, J.J and Washbush, J.B. (1991). Predicting simulation performance: Difference between individuals and groups. In W.J.Wheatley and J.Gosenpud (Eds), Developments business simulation and experimental exercises (18) 44-48

  • Hackman, J.R (Ed) (1990) groups that work ( and those that don’t). San Franciso: Jossey- Bass 9) Jaffe, E.D and Nebenzahl I.D (1990) Group interaction and business game performance. Simulation and Gaming.

  • Mello, J.A (1993) Improving individual member accountability in small work group work. Journal of management Education, 17 (2) 253-259.

  • Strong, J.T and Anderson, R.E (1990, Summer). Freeriding in group projects: control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of marketing education, 12, 61-67



DOI: