Total views : 97

Importance versus Achieved: A Cross-Sectional Study on Engineering Students' Perception on Generic Attributes

Affiliations

  • Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, India

Abstract


The objective of the present study is twofold. First is to explore engineering students' perceptions on the importance of generic attributes required to become a successful engineer, and, second is to assess the extent to which the students possess these generic attributes. To achieve the objectives a cross-sectional study was conducted among final year engineering students pursing various engineering programmes under a state technical university in Odisha,India,during the academic session of spring 2016. Making use of the survey method, data were collected from the respondents with the help of a questionnaire. The results indicate that there is a serious mismatch between the students' perception on the importance of the generic attributes,and the attributes possessed by them. In addition, the findings reveal that students possess very less knowledge on discipline-specific technology and tools. The social and business contexts of practicing engineering is also not much known to them, in addition to possessing inadequate problem-solving and leadership skills. Further, they are not able to manage the stress in their lives even though they are very well aware of its importance in a person's general well-being.

Keywords

Generic Attributes, Engineering Students, Engineering Education, Knowledge, Skills, Academia.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 62)

References


  • Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), 2008. Criteria for accreditation of engineering programs. Accessed from: http://www.abet.org/ on June 2015.
  • Alpay, E. and Jones, M.E., 2012. Engineering education in research-intensive universities. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(6), pp.609-626.
  • Barrie, S.C., 2006. Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher education, 51(2), pp.215-241.
  • Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S. and Swann, R., 2004. Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), pp.313-328.
  • Blom, A. and Saeki, H., 2011. Employability and skill set of newly graduated engineers in India.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. http://www.npiu.nic.in/PDF/Mentoring%20and%20 Audting/BEmploybility%20and%20Skill%20set%20of%20ne wly%20graduated%20engineers%20in%20India.pdf
  • Danielewicz-Betz, A. and Kawaguchi, T., 2014. Preparing Engineering Students for Global Workplace Communication: Changing the Japanese Mindsets. iJEP, 4(1), pp.55-68.
  • Farr, J.V. and Brazil, D.M., 2009. Leadership skills development for engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), pp.3-8.
  • Holsapple, M.A., Carpenters, D.D., Sutkus, J.A., Finelli, C.J. and Harding, T.S., 2012. Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), p.169.
  • Kruger, S. (2006). Developing non-technical skills through co-operative education” The Third V.T. Vittachi International Conference, July.
  • Kumar, S. andHsiao, J.K., 2007. Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: Planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7(1), pp.18-23.
  • Lee, F.T., 2003. Identifying essential learning skills in students' engineering education, Monash University Malaysia.
  • Lemaitre, D., Prat, R.L., Graaff, E.D. and Bot, L., 2006. Editorial: Focusing on competence. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), pp.45-53.
  • Male, S.A., Bush, M.B. and Chapman, E.S., 2010. Perceptions of competency deficiencies in engineering graduates. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), pp.55-68.
  • Martin, R., Maytham, B., Case, J. and Fraser, D., 2005. Engineering graduates' perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry.European journal of engineering education, 30(2), pp.167-180.
  • Nair, C.S., Patil, A. and Mertova, P., 2009. Reengineering graduate skills–a case study. European journal of engineering education, 34(2), pp.131-139.
  • http://www.nasscom.in/sites/default/files/NASSCO M-Annual-Report-2015_0.pdf
  • National Board of Accreditation (2015). http://www.nbaind.org/En/1051-nbasaccreditationparameterscriteria-and-processes.aspx.
  • Pallant, J., 2013. SPSS survival manual. McGrawHill Education (UK).
  • Passow, H.J., 2012. Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), p.95.
  • Patil, A.S., 2005. The global engineering criteria for the development of a global engineering profession. World Transaction on Engineering Education,4(1), pp.49-52.
  • Radcliffe, D.F., 2005. Innovation as a Meta attribute for graduate engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), pp.194-199.
  • Ramadi, E., Ramadi, S. and Nasr, K., 2016. Engineering graduates' skill sets in the MENA region: a gap analysis of industry expectations and satisfaction. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(1), pp.34-52.
  • Robledo, I.C., Peterson, D.R. and Mumford, M.D., 2012. Leadership of scientists and engineers: A three vector model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), pp.140-147.
  • The Engineers of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (2004), National Academy of Engineering,The National Academic Press. https://insi de.mines.edu/UserFiles/File/Assessment/Engr2020.pdf
  • Wellington, P., Thomas, I., Powell, I. and Clarke, B., 2002. Authentic assessment applied to engineering and business undergraduate consulting teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), pp.168-179.